Download PDF

The Background

The task that the democratically elected leaders of newly independent India embarked on in the early on 1950s was not for the faint of eye. It was to lift living standards of a people bookkeeping for 1-seventh of the globe's population who earned an boilerplate income that was one-fifteenth of the average American income of the time.1 Three-fourths of the Indian people were engaged in agriculture working with archaic tools and techniques, every bit either destitute landless laborers, highly insecure tenants-at-volition, or small-plot holders eking out subsistence living from their meager plots. The literacy rate stood at 14 percent, and the average life expectancy was thirty-two years.

How successful has the country been in fulfilling the task over threescore years after? The charts in this commodity, using World Banking concern data, evidence how some of the state's development indicators have changed in the final half-century. The country has experienced an increase in per capita income—especially since the 1980s—equally well equally reductions in poverty and infant mortality rates. These improvements are not insignificant and marking a abrupt intermission from the near stagnation that the country experienced during British rule. Simply a comparison with the later superior functioning of China and South korea, countries with a comparable level of development in the 1950s, reveals that India'due south performance remains below its potential. How did that come nigh? This essay provides an business relationship of Bharat's strategy of economic development, its achievements, shortfalls, and time to come challenges.

The Initial Strategy

The government in the 1950s adopted a very particular strategy of economic development: rapid industrialization by implementing centrally prepared v-yr plans that involved raising a massive corporeality of resources and investing them in the cosmos of large industrial state-endemic enterprises (SOEs).2 The industries called were those producing basic and heavy industrial appurtenances such as steel, chemicals, machines and tools, locomotives, and ability. Industrialization was pursued because leaders believed, based in role on the beliefs of some economists, that the industrial sector offers the greatest scope of growth in product. It was non that the Indian agricultural sector offered no scope for growth. Crop yields in Republic of india were quite depression compared to other countries, and the recent famine in 1943 had underscored the need to increase food production. Still, Indian leaders did non desire to brand agriculture the mainstay of their strategy. The preeminence of agriculture they believed was characteristic of a backward economy, and growth in agriculture somewhen runs up confronting the trouble of bereft demand. There is but and then much, later on all, that people are willing to swallow.

Investments in the cosmos of public enterprises were chosen considering ane goal of the regime was to establish a "socialistic pattern of society," i.e., using democratic methods to bring big swathes of the country's productive resources under public ownership. Industries producing basic and heavy goods were chosen for investment over consumer goods because the government wanted to reduce the land's reliance on imports of basic and heavy industrial goods in line with their belief in the goodness of national self-reliance. "To import from abroad is to be slaves of
strange countries," the first Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, once declared.3 The production of consumer goods such as clothing, furniture, personal care products, and like goods was left to small privately run cottage industry firms that had the added reward of being labor-intensive and therefore a potential generator of mass employment.

The particular nature of the chosen strategy of evolution can be understood by comparison it to the alternative strategies that could have been adopted. I such strategy would have been to prioritize public investments in not industry but agronomics, which was the source of livelihood for more than than iii-fourths of its people. Investments in agriculture take the form of irrigation projects, instruction of farmers in scientific methods of farming, construction of rural roads and storage facilities, and agricultural inquiry and development. Once the agronomical sector was relatively healthy and the poverty of its participants somewhat reduced, rise incomes could have been used to finance industrial development. The planners rejected such a strategy because putting off industrialization meant that the country would have to continue to rely on imports for needed industrial appurtenances, while the leaders were impatient for the industrialization they identified with progress. People who argued for the priority of agriculture over manufacture were dismissed equally being reactionaries and possibly stooges of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

All charts based upon World Banking concern data for Republic of india. See information.worldbank.org

Some other strategy could have been to rely on individual enterprise for industrial development while the government focused its resource on
investments in infrastructure, public health, and education—sectors that are not served well past the private sector. Though leaders were cognizant of the dynamism of the private sector and the existence of India'southward vibrant entrepreneurial grade, they rejected the strategy that involved a prominent function for the private sector out of a commitment to establishing the socialistic pattern of society that they believed was morally superior. As things eventually turned out, the country came around in the 1990s to adopting this previously rejected strategy.

In club to clinch the success of the government's chosen strategy in the 1950s, complementary measures were put in place. Nigh industries were given significant trade protection so that their growth was not hampered past contest from more efficient foreign producers. An industrial licensing system was fix to ensure that private enterprises would not expand across the bounds that national planners had set for them. The organization required all private firms beyond a certain small-scale size to obtain a license whenever they wanted to expand capacity, produce new products, change their input mix, import inputs, or relocate plants. The system put the activities of the private sector under significant control of the government. Pundits and students of political economic system who were not socialists derisively nicknamed this stifling system "the license Raj," comparing this economic format of oppression to the political control of the imperialist British Raj.

Their strategy of increasing agricultural production was based on plans to reform agrarian institutions. According to the thinking of the planners, the poor functioning of Indian agriculture was due to the fact that tillers did not own the land they worked, then they had petty incentive to make land improvements that would increment long-term productivity. The government planned to implement legislation to redistribute country from large landlords to bodily tillers and improve the terms under which tenant cultivators leased land from the landowners. The government also planned to organize small farmers into cooperative societies so that their resources could be pooled in order to buy mod tools and implements and the force of their numbers could be used to obtain higher crop prices. In addition to increasing farm production, such reforms were also expected to alleviate the poverty of the huge class of peasants.

The Initial Results

Industrialization was a moderate success. The newly created public enterprises, albeit later on major cost overruns and several delays, turned out steel, chemicals, and other products that were generally associated with adult countries. A British colonial official in the early on twentieth century in one case scoffed that he would exist willing to eat all the steel than the Indians would produce.4 If live in 1960, he would take eaten vi,300 tons of steel.five

Still, past the belatedly 1950s several issues resulting from the planners' chosen strategy of economical evolution were coming to the fore, and such problems intensified in the 1960s and the 1970s. Many SOEs were run on political rather than economic considerations, and so they produced losses that drained government resources rather than—as the planners had hoped—augmenting them. The SOEs could also not be counted on to generate mass employment due to their upper-case letter and skill rather than labor-intensive character. Several enterprises were overstaffed and faced bereft demand for what they produced, forcing them to render idle some of their capacity. The case of the Haldia fertilizer plant is an extreme just illustrative case. The plant was gear up in the 1970s and employed one,500 people. The workers and managers showed upward regularly, kept the machine facilities clean and in working condition, and often received annual bonuses and overtime. They lived in a nearby spanking-new township built specially for them, one that had first-class roads, schools, and homes. There was just one matter missing. Because of numerous problems, the establish never produced even an ounce of fertilizer. Withal the government kept Haldia's lights on for twenty-one years.six

1 government method for financing expenditures was the cosmos of new coin, which resulted in significant inflation.

The expenditures necessitated past the massive investments in SOEs generated new problems. I regime method for financing expenditures was the creation of new money, which resulted in significant aggrandizement. The government feared the political backlash that the rising prices could generate. Consequently, it resorted to price controls of essential commodities, which caused black markets to flourish, and the government found itself resorting to increasingly intrusive regulations and engaging in cat-and-mouse games with traders. At one bespeak, the regime fifty-fifty attempted to nationalize wholesale trade in grains without much success. The efforts at price controls generally failed while consuming much public and private attention.

The plans for the reform of agrarian institutions did not pan out. The push for land redistribution ran into political opposition and clashed with the requirements of due process, then equally little equally v per centum of the land was actually redistributed. The creation of agricultural cooperatives also did non materialize due to difficulties of organization and lack of enthusiasm on the basis. Agricultural production barely kept step with population growth, and the country'due south food security remained precarious. The drawback of prioritizing industry over agriculture for public investments became glaringly apparent when the country experienced a nutrient crisis in the mid-1960s, necessitating urgent large-scale imports of subsidized grain from the U.s.. The crunch undermined the government's claim that its strategy of prioritizing industry over agriculture for public investment would increase national self-reliance.

The drawback of prioritizing industry over agriculture for public investments became glaringly apparent when the state experienced a food crisis in the mid-1960s, necessitating urgent large-scale imports of subsidized grain from the United States.

Under the fixed substitution rate regime that existed in the country, high inflation in the 1960s reduced the country's exports while increasing its imports, resulting in a shortage of strange exchange. The shortage was exacerbated past the food imports made necessary by a drought and a state of war with Pakistan. Foreign commutation became one of the items the government had to resort to rationing. The reverberations were felt throughout the economy. Several new factories lay idle for want of strange exchange to import some necessary inputs, while others hoarded foreign exchange to starve their competitors or earn a premium in the black market place. Holding foreign exchange without a license became an criminal offense punishable by jail time. Ultimately, the rupee had to be devalued, which generated further disruptions in the economic lives of nigh people.

Meanwhile, the industrial licensing system, designed to ensure that the individual sector operated co-ordinate to the v-twelvemonth plans, became a source of much inefficiency and corruption. The micromanagement of the private sector called for much more than cognition and technical ability than government bureaucrats possessed. The arrangement descended into a mechanism for rewarding political supporters of the rulers, which undermined the confidence of the people in the integrity of their governmental institutions.

Possibly the most unfortunate legacy of prioritizing manufacture at the expense of other alternatives for investment was that scarce public resources were diverted away from health and education. The meager resources expended on these in India stand up in marked dissimilarity to the plentiful attention paid to them in Mainland china and other Asian countries. Seventy years after independence, India has still to catch up on these fronts; half of its children are malnourished, one-half of women are illiterate, and twothirds of its people lack basic sanitation. As a result, a big fraction of Indians today are unable to direct take advantage of the opportunities opened upward by the country's recent tilt toward a market economy and globalization.

The Modify in Strategies

In response to the food crisis of the mid-1960s, the government changed its agricultural strategy. Rather than holding out for the reform of agrarian institutions, information technology began to guarantee higher crop prices to farmers and utilise subsidies to promote use of modernistic inputs such as chemical fertilizers and high-yielding varieties of grain developed in other parts of the world. The resulting surge of production—the so-called "green revolution" of the late 1960s—made the country self-sufficient in food grains. The strategy was controversial because it increased economical disparities among the farmers. For the greatest take a chance of success, the government had to focus its strategy on the irrigated sections—the very parts of the country that were already doing relatively well. The uptake of subsidized inputs was too the highest among large landowners, owing to their greater education, creditworthiness, and the ability to bear the hazard posed past adopting new methods. The strategy did not do much to alleviate the economic condition of the agrarian poor, other than providing the indirect benefit of living in a country with better overall food security that has not since experienced famine. Micronutrient deficiencies (non caloric) such every bit anemia are today a bigger problem amid the poor, and the state's health indicators lag behind those of other countries with comparable levels of income.

The strategy toward industry, however, turned more interventionist after 1965. Elaboration of all the reasons for this need not detain us hither; there is a strong case that the interventionist plow was a cynical ploy by new Prime Minister Indira Gandhi for consolidating her power in response to certain political developments. The new policy opinion displayed a suspicion of big firms and a preference for the minor. The licensing arrangement imposed additional restrictions on the activities of big firms, curtailing their growth. Nether a policy that was one of a kind, consumer goods such equally dress, footwear, furniture, sporting goods, part supplies, leather appurtenances, and kitchen appliances were reserved by police force for production by small firms. Foreign firms were asked to dilute their buying stake in their Indian subsidiaries and in response, multinationals such as IBM and Coca-Cola closed their operations and left the country.

To the extent that the success of the large firms was due to their superior technical or organizational chapters, the curtailment of their growth meant that such capacity remained underutilized. Delays and arbitrariness in the issuing of industrial licenses resulted in supply bottlenecks and shortages of many consumer goods. For example, in the 1970s, there was an eight-year waiting list for people wanting to purchase a scooter, the preferred vehicle for middle-class Indians.

Thirty-five years after independence, India'southward leadership had yet to accomplish, to whatsoever significant degree, its pledge of lifting living standards.

The reservation of consumer goods for small enterprises meant that the benefits of economies of calibration were forgone, resulting in the production of poor-quality and high-priced goods that foreigners shunned and domestic consumers had no pick simply to accept. Meanwhile, countries such as Republic of korea and Taiwan were growing rich by exporting this very category of goods. It was during this time that Indians developed a craze for foreign products, the imports of which were restricted, and the term "imported" became synonymous with "high-quality." The
result of such policies was economical stagnation. The land'due south per capita income grew by an average of less than one percent a year betwixt 1966 and 1980, a rate that was too low to brand a dent in the state's massive poverty. 30-five years after independence, Bharat's leadership had yet to achieve, to any significant degree, its pledge of lifting living standards.

Besides, years of rhetoric about creating rapid development had heightened people's expectations for their quality of living. Economic stagnation, combined with high aggrandizement caused by the authorities's printing of massive amounts of money, bred political unrest and pop agitation, to which Indira Gandhi responded by declaring a national emergency in 1975. Taking reward of the intermission of democratic procedures and requirements of due process brought on past the emergency, the Prime number Minister attempted strict interventions that included rapid country redistribution and forced sterilization as a part of population control. The programs were poorly administered, contributed to incidents of human rights violations, failed to meliorate the economic situation, and caused a number of unintended consequences. For instance, the regime's attempts to liquidate debts of poor farmers led to the virtual drying upwards of informal sources of credit and the banks were non up to the job of picking upward the slack. The chaos generated by the haphazard and poorly administered interventions generated a popular backlash and tainted in many minds the whole interventionist approach to economic development.

By the 1980s, a substantial number of influential people had come effectually to the conclusion that the government did non have the political and administrative chapters to successfully run a controlled economy that delivered on economical growth. Gandhi, moderated by the political defeats that followed her before attempts to impose strict controls, acquiesced to relaxing some of them. Her Cambridge-educated son, Rajiv Gandhi, who succeeded her as Prime Minister, enacted further liberalization. Certain industries and business organisation activities were exempted from licensing requirements. Such measures helped to cause robust industrial growth in the late 1980s.

The About Plough

When a foreign substitution shortage threatened a crisis once again in 1991, the government made a clear break with past policies. By then, the intellectual consensus in favor of country-led, import-substituting development strategies had greatly weakened. The breakup of the Soviet Spousal relationship had substantially discredited central planning, and the export-led success of E Asian countries had thrown into light the drawbacks of an inwards-looking model of development. Also, cultural changes in Republic of india, consisting of a deemphasis of asceticism and a greater credence of the pursuit of cloth gain, had made extensive economic controls untenable.7 At the behest of the International Budgetary Fund (IMF), which provided rescue during the strange substitution crisis, but also of its ain accordance, the authorities appear major economic reforms. It dismantled the license Raj almost overnight, slashed tax rates and import duties, removed controls on prices and entry of new firms, put up several SOEs for auction, and rolled out the welcome mat for foreign investors. Rather than socialism, the guiding principles of policy at present were liberalization, privatization, and globalization.

The land'south share in world trade increased from 0.4 percentage on the eve of the reforms to 1.5 per centum in 2006, and foreign substitution shortages, once a chronic headache for policymakers, have now been replaced by reserves upward of US $350 billion . . .

The economy responded with a surge in growth, which averaged 6.three percent annually in the 1990s and the early 2000s, a rate double that of earlier time frames. Shortages disappeared. On the eve of the reforms, the public telecom monopoly had installed five million landlines in the entire country and there was a vii-year waiting listing to go a new line. In 2004, private cellular companies were signing up new customers at the rate of five million per month. The number of people who lived beneath the poverty line decreased betwixt 1993 and 2009 from 50 percentage of total population to 34 percent. The verbal estimates vary depending on the poverty line used, but even culling estimates indicate a post-1991 decline of poverty that is more rapid than at any other time since independence. The country's share in world trade increased from 0.4 percent on the eve of the reforms to 1.5 percent in 2006, and strange exchange shortages, once a chronic headache for policymakers, have at present been replaced past reserves upward of US $350 billion—prompting debates most what to practise with the "excess reserves."8

Several significant economic challenges remain for India. The economy has polarized into a highly productive, modern, and globally integrated formal sector, employing about x percent of the labor forcefulness, and a low-productivity sector consisting of agronomics and urban informal activities, engaging 90 percentage of the labor force. The sectors that have experienced the nigh growth are services and capital-intensive manufacturing. Information technology is illustrative that IT and pharmaceuticals are the two sectors of the economy with international renown. Such industries tend to exist urban and employ mainly skilled workers. Yet to come up Bharat's mode are millions of lowskill manufacturing jobs that have allowed the poor in East Asian countries to climb into the heart course. Companies are loath to prepare labor-intensive manufacturing because Indian labor laws are some of the nigh restrictive in the world. For example, a manufacturing unit hiring more 100 workers cannot lay off any of them without seeking government permission, which is rarely granted.9 Liberalization of labor laws tends to run into fierce political opposition. The second reason for the dearth of manufacturing jobs is that the country'due south infrastructure is relatively deficient, and then companies increasingly practicing just-in-fourth dimension inventory management exercise not find information technology cost-effective to include India in their global supply chains.10

The provision of public services in Bharat is fearfully poor. Government schools and clinics are underfunded and inadequately supervised, and their workers display low morale and high absence. However such public institutions are rarely held accountable for their performance.11 The middle grade has largely opted out of the system in favor of individual health intendance, schools, and transportation and so in that location is trivial political pressure from them to improve the arrangement. Most heart-class Indians now fifty-fifty own a ability generator to cope with everyday power cuts. The poor take the brunt of the derelict public services. Two 1000000 children die in India every year from easily preventable diseases, according to the Un Children's Fund (UNICEF), and immunization rates in India are amidst the lowest in the world. Air pollution levels in urban areas pose a severe public health crisis. According to a survey by the World Health Organisation (WHO), thirteen out of the twenty well-nigh polluted cities in the world are Indian.12 The land withal relies heavily on inexpensive coal to generate power and has shown very piddling willingness to move toward alternative energy sources.

Given the current policies and state of governance in India, it is difficult to see an obvious path into the middle class for the multitudes still remaining in poverty. Global need for low-wage, low-skill labor to sew T-shirts or assemble TVs is non what it used to be, considering production is now becoming increasingly mechanized and some of information technology is beingness "reshored" back to the rich countries. For several hundred million poor people in frail health and with niggling education, the state will have to find a way to overcome the technical, institutional, and economical barriers to developing the capabilities necessary for functioning in a twenty-starting time-century economy. It is not a task for the faint-hearted.

NOTES

one. The figure is calculated from the estimated per capita income of the ii countries. Run across The Madisson-Project (2013) database at http://tinyurl.com/pvqeuay.

2. Francine Frankel provides a detailed study of how such a strategy came to be chosen is in Bharat'south Political Economy: 1947-2004, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Printing, 2005).

3. Arvind Panagariya, Republic of india: An Emerging Behemothic (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), 25.

4. Wolfgang Messner, Working with Republic of india (Berlin: Springer Publishing, 2009), 49.

v. The tonnage statistic comes from the Handbook of Earth Steel Statistics (1978), published by the International Fe and Steel Institute.

vi. This and many other cases of economic dysfunctions of the era are recounted by a quondam CEO and public intellectual, Gurcharan Das, in his memoirs, India Unbound: From Independence to Information Historic period (New Delhi: Penguin Books India, 2000).

7. For an elaboration, run into Nimish Adhia, "The Role of Ideological Alter in India's Economic Liberalization," The Journal of Socio-Economics 44, issue C (2013): 103– 111.

8. Panagariya provides a detailed academic reference on Indian economic policies and their effects in India: An Emerging Giant.

9. Jagdish Bhagwati and Arvind Panagariya give a fuller business relationship of Indian labor laws in Bharat's Tryst with Destiny (New York: Harper Collins, 2012).

10. Robyn Meredith well describes the twenty-first-century multinational supply chains in chapter five of her book, "The Disassembly Line," in The Elephant and the Dragon (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2007).

eleven. Good accounts of the lives of India's poor and the causes of the dysfunction in the country's public services are given past Jean Dreze and Amartya Sen in An Uncertain Glory: India and its Contradictions (Princeton: Princeton Academy Press, 2013), and Esther Duflo and Abhijit Banerjee in Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Fashion to Fight Global Poverty (New York: PublicAffairs, 2011).

12. "Thirteen of the Twenty Virtually Polluted Cities in the World Are Indian," Quartz India, last modified December 7, 2014, http://tinyurl.com/nyekwwk.