Never Eat Lunch in This Town Again
See a Problem?
Cheers for telling united states about the problem.
Friend Reviews
Reader Q&A
Be the first to ask a question about You'll Never Eat Lunch in this Boondocks Again
Community Reviews
What I constitute was a memoir from an egotistical, self-indulgent woman who lacks humility and the capacity for self-analysis. 1 of those books where someone talks near all the drugs they've done, all the sh*t they've been through, but never seems to really examine the correlation between the ii. And if they do accept responsibility for where they are, they only do it in tandem with i
Sigh. I'd always heard I needed to read this book - it was a 'must read' for anyone in The Industry in Hollywood.What I found was a memoir from an egotistical, self-indulgent woman who lacks humility and the chapters for cocky-analysis. One of those books where someone talks well-nigh all the drugs they've done, all the sh*t they've been through, but never seems to actually examine the correlation between the two. And if they do accept responsibility for where they are, they only do it in tandem with insisting that the world is confronting them.
Certain, at that place were a lot of insights to the fashion things worked in Hollywood in the 70's and 80's...sure, there were a lot of drug stories about famous people (large whoop). But what did I go out of this (besides the moral that Julia is a 'my way or the highway'-kinda gal, and that if others don't concur with her, they're against her)? Not much.
Deportment have consequences. And so exercise behaviors. Abound up, Julia. Ain your decisions, and recognize that your choices got y'all where you are.
...more
At 600 pages, this rant remains in dire need of an editor, but would benefit even more than from a plot. Basically, our not-so-humble narrator gets lucky with The Sting in 1973, then it all turns to drugs, and then it all turns to shit. Her primary business organization – beyond any pretence of allegiance to drug-dealers, family, colleagues and friends – appears to be keeping her tabular array at a dining-hole in Hollywood where she tin can run across and exist seen, hence the tit
A long trawl through shallow waters - well, shallow people.At 600 pages, this rant remains in dire need of an editor, merely would benefit fifty-fifty more from a plot. Basically, our not-so-humble narrator gets lucky with The Sting in 1973, then it all turns to drugs, then it all turns to shit. Her principal business organisation – beyond any pretence of fidelity to drug-dealers, family unit, colleagues and friends – appears to be keeping her table at a dining-hole in Hollywood where she can run across and be seen, hence the title.
The fact that Hollywood power-brokers are non-creative, cliquey, scandalously overpaid, vain, ambitious, addictive, obsessive, compulsive and above all treacherous parasites should come every bit no surprise to anyone who's bothered to pick up this book. What is surprising is that an operator with all of those traits and more could vomit up a story from it and not break long plenty to find whatsoever redemption whatever in herself or her surround.
Perchance the saddest attestation to this tragedy comes in reading it today, 15-years after publication. Names that once clattered when she dropped them now ring hollow equally fifty-fifty the net can't dredge upwardly whatsoever trace of them. And every bit for those who remain 'names,' take a await at the bonus features disc of The Sting DVD – Redford, Newman et al looking back on their film in 2005 (a film that Phillips spends half the book telling usa was her creative genius) and the name 'Phillips' does non come up up one time in hours of recorded fabric. Who she?
...more
It would be easier to
Julia Phillips burned her bridges beyond recognition with this memoir of life in the fast lane of 1970s Hollywood. In that location are very few people who were big from the tardily 1960s to the early 1990s who aren't mentioned here, mostly unfavorably. The lady had good reason to be aroused; the machinations of getting a picture made are ludicrous enough to bulldoze anyone over the edge. She freely admits that she didn't assist her own cause by spending nigh of her time looking for her next high.It would be easier to be on her side - she was, afterward all, the first female producer to win a Best Picture Oscar, and was backside some seminal films (The Sting, Taxi Commuter, Close Encounters of the Third Kind) if she didn't go out of her way to exist so unlikeable. She has the redeeming feature of the nifty love she has for her daughter, Kate, who sounds like astounding person. Other than that, yet, she sounds similar the classic egotist (and, ridiculously astern in her linguistic communication). She is smarter (in her own mind) than well-nigh anybody she meets, she calls black people the N-word and gay people all manner of slurs. Her bigotry well-nigh people who are overweight is downright repulsive.
Yous'll Never Eat Lunch In This Town Again is full of aliases in order to avoid lawsuits, I suspect, but I besides suspect that Hollywood insiders knew exactly which people Phillips was referring to when she changed a name. Nonetheless, she is fine with naming and shaming Spielberg, Geffen, Erica Jong and numerous others. David Geffen was and then furious with the release of this book that he dumped her from the negotiations they were in the middle of for Interview with the Vampire. And, as information technology turned out, she didn't have lunch in some of the virtually important places in that town again. She got banned from Morton's where, for many years, she had her own tabular array.
I would accept liked the book better (I do love dish, so it would normally exist tailor-made for me) if (1) information technology had been proofed for grammar (for someone who is supposedly so intelligent, she should know how to apply the words "I" and "me" in a judgement); and (two) if information technology had been shorter (a good editor could accept shown her how to tighten it up and dump the extraneous, existential meandering). I'm very glad I read information technology; I simply wish I'd liked it, and her, a chip more.
...more than
Only this is one book written by a celebrity that is most definitely not ghost-written.... and maybe it should accept been. It's hideously self-indulgent and seems like it was never edited or revised. I am a fast reader and it took me several hours to get through 100 pages of this book.
By all means this should be a fascinating, juicy Hollywood tell-all. I was thrilled to spot it in a secondhand store and grabbed it, primarily because of the excellent cover blueprint on the vintage version I'd found.But this is one book written past a celebrity that is well-nigh definitely not ghost-written.... and maybe it should have been. It'southward hideously self-indulgent and seems like it was never edited or revised. I am a fast reader and it took me several hours to get through 100 pages of this book. I could not stop it.
This COULD have been great. And for a book that trash-talks so many of Julia Phillips' peers at the fourth dimension, information technology should at least be well-written to be worth burning all those bridges. But it's non.
It reads exactly like how someone on coke talks, which is to say, rambly, incoherent, and irritating.
...more
A behind-the-scenes tell-all of my favorite UFO movie, written by a drug addicted picture producer who happens to be the beginning female person picture show producer to win an Oscar for best picture? Sounded irresistible and then I picked up a copy of Julia Phillips' best-selling Hollywood chronicle. OK, in that location was far less nigh "Close Encounters of The Third Kind" than I had hoped for. "You lot'll Never East Lunch in This Boondocks Again" is really the autobiography of Julia Phillips. Truthfully, I had never heard of Julia Phil
A backside-the-scenes tell-all of my favorite UFO moving-picture show, written past a drug addicted picture producer who happens to exist the first female movie producer to win an Oscar for best picture? Sounded irresistible so I picked upwardly a copy of Julia Phillips' best-selling Hollywood chronicle. OK, there was far less almost "Close Encounters of The Third Kind" than I had hoped for. "Y'all'll Never East Lunch in This Boondocks Again" is really the autobiography of Julia Phillips. Truthfully, I had never heard of Julia Phillips who died in 2002 - ten years before I discovered her somehow, via my wayward web surfing.
Phillips begins by chronicling her childhood in Brooklyn during the 1940's. From at that place she makes her style through college, and and so onto her spousal relationship to beau producer Michael Phillips. After about a 100 pages, she begins detailing her ascension through the movie industry. Strangely, bated from the chapters on Shut Encounters, Phillips discusses many more than pre-production situations almost money, hiring, etc. - than she does the actual work on the sets of her films. Sometimes, especially during the first one-half of the book, Phillips phases out of present tense, and holds flashback sessions in which she refers to herself in the tertiary person. While reading, this technique seemed a tad confusing and unnecessary. Bated from that, Phillips' obvious talent every bit a author demonstrates why she enjoyed such a successful movie producer - for a while, at least.
Afterwards reading "You'll Never Swallow ...." here in 2012, I found that it does not live upwardly to advanced billing equally a "shocking tell-all." Perhaps I feel this style because I've become desensitized from two decades of celebrity tell-all books published since the initial release of Phillips' book in 1991. Withal, I should acknowledge that Phillips raised the bar for books of this nature when "You lot'll Never Eat …" first came out.
A lot the hubbub surrounding this book must have centered on her the endless cheeky comments and personality critiques Phillips makes about influential Hollywood characters of the belatedly 70's and 1980'due south. But bated from a couple notorious observations about Goldie Hawn, the clay is usually limited to character assassinations of her business and movie industry contemporaries. And sometimes, she's even a flake evasive about the identity of her targets by skipping the name and merely alluding to whom the person might exist. This usually happens when she's discusses the drug employ of other Hollywood figures. Not very over-the-pinnacle. And if you're too immature (like yours truly) to be familiar with the movie moguls and big names of the 1970's you may not take an thought of who she'southward describing/disparaging anyway.
Toward the very end of the book, Phillips recounts a close meet (pun intended) with a adequately modern celebrity:
"Paula Abdul, who has choreographed several of Mary'south videos, comes over to say how-do-you-do, and we invite her to sit down down. Within a minute, she is pouring her heart out to Mary near the lousy treatment she'south received from Janet Jackson, who has not acknowledged Paula'southward contribution to her videos or her stardom. She must have been truly injure to exist and then open up in front of a complete stranger. The erstwhile Hollywood boogie...... A year later Abdul's album would have 4 hit singles and soar to number ane. Had she go a star because another star rejected her? A case of 'fuck me? no fuck you' .......No doubt."
Phillips' auto-bio is replete with cracking observations similar this i (to a higher place). In a way, Phillips was holding a mirror up to the ugly, selfish and greedy side of the entertainment manufacture - the side that most never see. Phillips' witty, and often mischievous writing style, combined with her very judgmental and sometimes spitfire attitude carried me though all 615 pages. In other words, "Yous'll Never East Tiffin in This Town Again" remains an engaging read - considering that it is a somewhat dated account of the movie industry in the late 70's and eighty's.
...more
Until I read this book, I had no idea what a producer might actually contribute to a film. Every bit described by Phillips, a producer pretty much does everything that no i else has done——and chronicles this
This was such an entertaining volume to read——very witty, very dishy, and and then very Hollywood. Julia Phillips won an Oscar for producing ane of the finest films in history, Close Encounters of the 3rd Kind, and she was involved in the product of other fine films such as Taxi Commuter and the Sting.Until I read this book, I had no idea what a producer might actually contribute to a picture show. As described by Phillips, a producer pretty much does everything that no one else has done——and chronicles this in the context of a downwards personal spiral fueled by drugs du jour, mostly cocaine, the "breakfast of champions." Reminiscent of the equally witty musings of Carrie Fisher but Phillips names names.
...more
Julia is a sharp wi
This is a Hollywood book that makes me glad my fantasies of becoming a feature filmmaker never came true. Julia Phillips was a successful female (1 of the outset) film producer in the latter office of the 20th Century with credits such as "The Sting," "Close Encounters...," "Taxi Commuter," and others that have left their marker upon us all. As a issue, she looks at the film business organization from the meridian down, the POV of the coin people and decision makers that manipulate anybody else.Julia is a sharp witted, sharp tongued niggler who manages to find fault with anybody she ever met, friends, business organization associates, lovers, her ex-husband, and herself. Regarding Goldie Hawn: "She is an okay broad. The best thing nigh her is The Laugh. The worst is that she is borderline dirty, with stringy hair - all the time."
This well-nigh a political party at Jane Fonda'south house loaded with top pic talent: "...these social gatherings that Hollywood people invent for themselves, normally to raise money for the crusade of the calendar week, bring out my shyness. Maybe snobbery, too, considering it's pretty funny, all this posturing, from a bunch of people who are predominately street hustlers, most of whom haven't gone to college, allow alone graduated from high school. They read moving their lips and they have horrible table manners."
Something else that Julia reveals is the prodigious amount of drugs consumed by the Hollywood elite. "To be perfectly off-white though, I take been partaking from a panoply of mood enhancers, stimulants and depressants all day. Every in one case in awhile, I would strike upon the perfect chemical combination: for Oscar dark it'southward been a diet pill, a small corporeality of coke, ii joints, vi halves of Valium, which makes three, and a glass and a half of vino. So far, I take a warm and comfortable feeling of well-being."
Say what?
...more than
While Phillip'due south account was compelling, a few thoughts nagged at me. Where was her married man all this fourth dimension? She describes him like a slice of furntiture leading a seperate life. How could she hold a job? Is Hollyowood actually that forgiving? Tin can you lot put all those drugs on your expense business relationship? And what kind of parent was she to her immature daughter? Phillips spends a lot of time tearing downwards other Hollywodo types (and may have been crossed off a few A lists), but the book actually paints a very agonizing portrait of its author. ...more than
But, oh, that first chapter. Phillips tells ALL about the night she won an Oscar, as a producer, for The Sting, and it's exhilarating to peek into the excess and ennui of the night. That first affiliate I'll never forget.
I tin't believe I've never read this, being an (abashed) Hollywoodphile. Turns out, I couldn't go through near of it. It was a box-role bummer, truly as miserable as it was juicy.Only, oh, that first chapter. Phillips tells ALL about the night she won an Oscar, equally a producer, for The Sting, and it's exhilarating to peek into the excess and ennui of the night. That first chapter I'll never forget.
...more
To follow her wheelings and dealings is really fun. She always has a quick quip or snappy putdown, but she also works really hard and has plenty of proficient reasons for her creative choices. Her personal ones: less then. She likes handsome men, DRUGS, and spending money on furs, jewels, and travel. I'd love to hear what her daughter has to say virtually all of this: many of the incidents described in her home are HORRIBLE for children, from seeing her
This is frenetic and weird and funny and inappropriate.To follow her wheelings and dealings is really fun. She always has a quick quip or snappy putdown, but she also works really hard and has enough of skilful reasons for her creative choices. Her personal ones: less so. She likes handsome men, DRUGS, and spending money on furs, jewels, and travel. I'd love to hear what her daughter has to say about all of this: many of the incidents described in her habitation are HORRIBLE for children, from seeing her mom cook up freebase to having mom's swain shoot up the house. She presents this as absurd and funny, which it is, but also: a child without control of her own life and surroundings had to go through this.
She provides a lot of details in some places and not then many in others. She tin can tell you what she wore and where she sat on a particular dark, just the whole explosion that sent her out of Hollywood gets remarkably few pages. I reread that section a few times to see what I missed--was information technology throwing the drugs on the table of an important meeting? Was it the open surreptitious of drugs in general? Was it the cowardice or weaseling of the people around her looking to push her out? There's a bit of foreshadowing most betrayal, but it's not clear to me how/why that exactly all went downwardly. She has the tone of someone being completely honest with you lot--nigh her dear/hate relationship with drugs, about her triumphs and frustrations with the motion picture biz, most her body and aging, about people she worked with, but underneath that in that location's a lot that goes unsaid. The denouement of Shut Encounters beingness a case in betoken.
Her comeback is fascinating as well. The fact that she'south a woman is all over this, running with the men, trying to become them to have her seriously, trying to play their game with their aggression and big egos, and succeeding for the most function, often to exist reminded that she's a adult female and therefore will never really count every bit much. The transition to the "suits" of the 1980s and the coin grubbing and greed and ridiculous pictures after the "artistic" flow of the 1970s is dramatic. She, as an individual, as a person, as a unique snowflake, obviously made her own choices. But there'south the larger story of her fighting the world and using drugs as a creative enhancer besides as to handle the stress of Hollywood but too Hollywood equally a woman. I call up she does a good task of pointing out how she acted just also the context in which she acted. And she never blames anyone else for the drugs--she liked them, she did them. But it'south like shooting fish in a barrel to see the environment in which she did them.
I enjoyed the writing. Sometimes, her puns were a little much for me (Brawl JOKES ARE HILARIOUS, EVEN BALL JOKES WE'VE HEARD Earlier). But in general, I constitute her style fresh and vibrant, and this was written 20-odd years ago. I didn't e'er get the transition from first to third person or her movie script pieces. I think the third person is supposed to give her more a chance to reflect on what she felt (as a heart-aged woman) coming through all of this, as her standard first-person autobiography narrates the events of life. These different sections become nearly duplicate both in content and format as her autobiography catches up with her present. And the motion picture scenes aren't a coherent movie (perchance that'south the indicate?) because they aren't used consistently enough or to tell a complete movie plot. But, as she says, what movie doesn't have its gimmicks? What life?
A fun read. Somewhen I simply let the names slide over me and enjoyed the crazy ride.
...more than
Beware of Warren Beatty.
A little dated, circa 1992, but even so relevant if you want to figure out the Hollywood movie subculture. Dejeuner is autobiographical and as much a cautionary tale of drug habit as insider info. I had a brief run-in with Hollywood when my novel Blues DELUXE was published in the mid '90s; had my very ain Hollywood Agent for a while, merely nothing ever came of it, and B.D. is now out of print. Looking dorsum on information technology now, my feel was a bit of a Catch 22: she snapped me up, on the chance that my bo
A lilliputian dated, circa 1992, just still relevant if you desire to figure out the Hollywood flick subculture. LUNCH is autobiographical and every bit much a cautionary tale of drug addiction every bit insider info. I had a cursory run-in with Hollywood when my novel BLUES DELUXE was published in the mid '90s; had my very own Hollywood Agent for a while, only cipher ever came of it, and B.D. is now out of print. Looking back on it now, my experience was a flake of a Catch 22: she snapped me upwards, on the run a risk that my volume might hit the all-time seller lists, when she would then exist positioned to make a bargain; I was trying to exercise it backwards, by finagling a pic deal to hype book sales.
Anyway, Lunch is a lot of fun to read; the gal is a hell of a writer. Julia makes herself wait so bad that it'south difficult not to believe every discussion of her story. For sheer fun, this book is difficult to beat, and you may acquire a thing or two about Hollywood while you are smiling and laughing. And then groaning at how a in one case powerful woman could go herself into such a mess.
WHAT DO You lot SAY WHEN WARREN BEATTY SUGGESTS A THREESOME WITH YOU AND YOUR TEENAGED Daughter? Julia: "We're both likewise erstwhile for yous."
I also enjoyed James Bacon's HOLLYWOOD IS A Iv Alphabetic character TOWN, merely that's even more than dated, at ©1976, about a supporting actor who mingled with a lot of "the greats." It has Steve McQueen, Jackie Gleason, Ruddy Skelton, Stan Laurel, Bing Crosby, Bob Hope, Zsa Zsa, Groucho, Sinatra, etc.
Some other awesome book on the Hollywood power construction, likewise from 1992, is THE Gild RULES past Paul Rosenfield. Very literary, and perceptive; Rosenfield made me stop reading often to recollect about the implications of what he was writing.
I haven't kept upward on the latest Hollywood Exposé books. But the central Hollywood truth won't change no matter how the tiny details arrange.
Nobody In Hollywood Wants To Hear Well-nigh Anyone They Haven't Already Heard About.
You won't "pause in," they will hear about you and and so they will come for you (with every intention of robbing you blind); then become iii independent experts to sextuple-check any deal you are thinking of signing.
I have a shelf of books on how to interruption into Hollywood and how to write screenplays, stuff like that. Reading most of them was a waste of time. (Except that I'm a "carrot" not a "stick" kind of guy, and so maybe I needed to read lots of crap to "proceed the dream alive" so I would keep moving forward.)
David Chasman'south thin book of aphorisms, EVERYTHING I NEEDED TO KNOW Virtually SUCCEEDING IN HOLLYWOOD I LEARNED FROM MY PIT-Bull, circa 1995 still kicks ass in 2013.
THE DEVIL'Southward GUIDE TO HOLLYWOOD by Joe Eszterhas ©2006 is the virtually upwardly-to-appointment Hollywood book I've read, merely, while I
do recommend this volume, it by and large expands on the info in PIT-Balderdash.In the mid Ninties I wanted to write a screenplay of my novel Blues Deluxe. My vague thought was that this would somehow help me to "Suspension Into Hollywood." The actual screenplay format is a elementary construction; even so, I knew I didn't dare jump right in and write the BLUES DELUXE screenplay. I needed a learning experience. So, I wrote an original activeness adventure screenplay first. It'due south actually non too bad. (Needs work.) Simply I learned a lot, by actually writing a screenplay: so that is my advice to other writers who want to learn how to write a screenplay. Write i! And then write the ane you really want to write.
I am somewhat disappointed that I actually adopt the Blues DELUXE screenplay I wrote to my original novel. The screenplay is really better, in my opinion. [insert pitiful-confront icon] Now go read You lot'LL NEVER Swallow Tiffin IN THIS Town Again. @hg47
...more than
Because Ms. Phillips, while being a "woman pioneer in a male dominated industry" also shows that actualy she gets somellace in it considering she is an asshole like the rest of them, the men she hates for the particulars she always remembers. She hates herself, likewise, incredibly and so, for the kinds of men she gets downward with turn out to be the very sort "proto-feminists" like her have complained about for years. But hey this is Hollywood! Nobody volition beloved you for who yous are, and they will hate you for what they think you are.
She becomes a first-form crevice addict pretty quick as soon as the starting time freebase torch shows up. All these Hollywood-sorts can ignore the drug laws- they far are above being mere mortals anyway. They go their dope messengered-in past courier. They can blow off courtroom appearances, post bond, get fined a slap on the wrist and be back in action adjacent week. They can wing around the world with a stash in their sock, sneak coke into rehab, and practice all manner of things that you and I, mere picayune people, have to realize are across our ain boundaries to attempt.
At present that I know this was all a great portrait of 80'southward-90'southward excess, in many ways it is a very good picture of a dysfunctional careerist in a concern I don't recall I would desire much to practise with (and and then why did I study film in college anyhow, if what might have happened was, I'd have ended up as a 3rd string grip working for assholes like Ms. Phillips! Perish the thought.)
And so she gets two stars, mainly for being a railroad train wreck, and why the hell I ought to care about a crack freak just because she made a big name for herself being equally much an asshole every bit the men she felt the need to destroy (along with the usual cattiness against sister film-people) past writing this.
"I did information technology my way." Oh, only didn't you. ...more
Parts are hilarious. Parts (similar dealing with Scorcese on the Taxi Commuter editing and Truffaut and Dreyfuss and the intricacies of the marketing on CETK) are incredibly compelling. I enjoyed her childhood and boyhood stuff likewise Julia Phillips was a trail-blazer. Brilliant, driven. An amazingly accomplished person. Many of her feats in the movie manufacture might be deemed inspirational. She is also a fantastic writer...sort of. Unfortunately...she's doesn't evangelize a fantastic autobiography here.
Parts are hilarious. Parts (similar dealing with Scorcese on the Taxi Driver editing and Truffaut and Dreyfuss and the intricacies of the marketing on CETK) are incredibly compelling. I enjoyed her childhood and boyhood stuff likewise. The prose is often evocative and sometimes poetic. Still...when Julia hits the 80s, the attraction of this book falls apart equally quickly equally her life did back and so. Her writing in the first half isn't gentle, it's barbed and acerbic, and she takes no prisoners, just in the second half is an enraged stomp over almost everyone she encounters. It's likewise, early 80s onwards, incredibly depressing, with her cocky-indulgent and self-destructive slide (leap!) into drug-employ and bridge-burning. She sorta comes back to life and piece of work in the late 80s, but she is a mere shadow of what she once was.
Julia Phillips was an enormous bowwow - if this book is any indication. She slams every single person she mentions (except her daughter) mercilessly, seeking out the negatives far more than consistently than the positives. Yet - credit to her - she doesn't hide her own graphic symbol. Warts and all, she comes across as most as despicable every bit the people she encounters on her sorry slingshot through life.
A talented writer - although the book has about four times as many ancedotes equally it needs (there'southward some juicy bits, but far too much repetition about drugs and people nosotros don't care about, peculiarly in the second half). A talented, brilliant person - but this is buried underneath a priviledged, racist, narrow-minded, rich bitch sensibility.
Julia Phillips had many facets - and accomplishments - that I admire. Yet this volume let me with a colossal amount of pity for her.
...more
Related Articles
Welcome back. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account.
Source: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/472032.You_ll_Never_Eat_Lunch_in_this_Town_Again
0 Response to "Never Eat Lunch in This Town Again"
Post a Comment